Followers

Tuesday, April 10, 2012



 “Codes of Gender” Film Paper   

Professor Sut Jhally narrates the documentary, “The Codes of Gender” which analyzes sex and gender in western culture. The film focuses on print ads to show the viewer how prevalent sexuality is used in advertising to emphasize the dramatic differences in masculinity and femininity. This documentary, released in 2009, provides several valid circumstances, but I find a hint of hypocrisy in many of his statements. Jhally’s film has intent to prove women are sexualized and thus provided such evidence in a multitude of displays. It appears he overlooked several images found all over the internet of men equally being exploited for the sake of success of his platform for his documentary.
Erving Goffman, a sociologist and author who had written numerous books on sex and gender believed nothing is natural about gender identity. Goffman claimed a person’s sex is simply characteristics from birth and that our gender identity derives from society and our culture.  He states that society and story culture communicate to us how femininity and masculinity should be performed. It is believed these traits are learned and not biologically natural. In western culture, we are consistently immersed in advertisements and we perceive these images of models depicted in differing poses as normal. Goffman feels that images of masculine and feminine behaviors are reinforced through advertisements.
Reinforced? Possibly, but our genitals are characteristics from birth and it is our brain that ultimately determines our gender identity. Society and culture absolutely have an impact on what is considered to be socially acceptable behavior for both sexes, but I believe biological evolution is what creates femininity and masculinity. I am also a firm believer that one is born gay and it is not necessarily a choice. This is relevant to the codes of gender in the aspect that someone can be socialized to be strong, athletic and dislike feminine oriented toys, and yet still find themselves gravitating towards a more feminine outlook. I find that it is society often looking for an excuse for gender behavior which is exemplified by this online article, “Our culture has difficulty understanding and accepting differences, especially in regard to gender norms. As a result, it can be a frightening thing to reveal these dissimilarities that will surely set one apart from society.”[1]
However, these “normal” images demonstrated by showing numerous magazine advertisements of beautiful women posing for the cameras in breathless postures is intended for us to interpret them as passive, weak and vulnerable.  Their hands portray a feminine, soft touch of either caressing themselves or cradling an object. Every photo proves a pattern of how delicate the women are arranged in promoting the product the advertiser is selling.
Various gender specific poses are dissected by Sut Jhally giving credibility to the notion that a woman is unprepared or lost. Numerous photograph’s overlap each other on screen validating the dependency and lack of control or power in the female models. The viewer naturally interprets these canting postures of a woman with a bended knee, crossed leg or their head turned as defenseless and weak. 
In a segment referred to as “The Ritualization of Subordination”, female bodies once again demonstrate feminism. The women appear to be sexually available, submissive and are often lying down. 
In contrast, advertisements featuring men’s hands depict him to be powerful, assertive, utilitarian and commanding. Each photograph Jhally shows is of a man that conveys strength and bold masculinity. The codes of masculinity show dominance, strength and power. Men are typically portrayed in more adult like poses, prepared and independent with poise and self-assurance. Male models used for this documentary are muscular, showcasing strong abdominal muscles and lead a viewer to accept he is tough and athletic.
Women are not the only ones being exploited. Media puts a stereo-type on men as well, often portraying them as the hard-working, never-at-home father figure. In an online article chronicling media awareness, it is said, “male characters are more often associated with the public sphere of work, rather than the private sphere of the home, and issues and problems related to work are more significant than personal issues”.[2]
The stereo-type roles of men and women are presented in this documentary to the extreme. Women are often portrayed as if she is off in her own world oblivious to her surroundings. However, men often look strong, alert and in control. In photographs of men and women posing together, the woman is typically shown leaning into the man to indicate neediness and dependency. The man usually serves as the anchor to guide and protect her as she appears to be drifting away and lost.
The documentary also refers to “infantilization” which claims that women never leave girl-hood behind. This is evidenced by various snapshots of women posing in child-like poses with their fingers in their mouth or using a childish prop, like a lollipop. Men always appear to be alert, in control and mature.
However, men are often depicted in a similar form of infantilization as well. Many men are portrayed in the media as a “frat boy” with a backwards cap and a college sweatshirt when it is obvious the man is in his mid-thirties.  The Man Show, on Comedy Central idolizes binge drinking, promiscuous behavior and promotes fighting. These examples demonstrate that men too are often conveyed to show a lack of desire to grow up and behave with a maturity that is adolescent at best.
With respect to the departed Goffman, who passed away in 1982, I find his views outdated. Thirty years ago this may have been more relevant, but in 2012, men are objectified just as much as women. Professional soccer player, David Beckham models underwear while posing with his hips thrust out and smoldering look on his face. In an online article, originally posted in fall 2009, it acknowledges the trend of men becoming more sexualized. “Outcries of sexism towards females by the advertising agencies, media and fashion photographers are becoming outdated and irrelevant when we see the same thing happening to men.”[3]
Recently, newer advertisements are featuring female athletes who are strong but are often depicted in photos as sexual and obedient. Nascar race driver, Danica Patrick, a petite woman who holds her own in competitive racing in a male dominated sport, submits herself in photograph’s as demure and fragile. The documentary questions whether or not female athletes want to prove they are not lesbian, and can still be viewed as feminine and sexual. Regardless, women are being shown as more active and in control, tough girls. Movies such as, Underworld, Kill Bill, Electra, and Lara Croft offer confirmation that many women are no longer interested in being characterized as the weaker sex.
            More women than ever are tackling on countless “manly” positions in the workplace, the military and politics. Perhaps even a decade ago, Jhally had more merit to his hypothesis that women are objectified and men are celebrated. However, as of 2012, both men and women are objectified; but I will agree with Goffman that culture and society are still defining how we view codes of gender. Jhally provided a convincing documentary of sexism but was bias towards showcasing women as the “victim” of exploitation. It is our western culture that chooses to use sexual objectification to promote and sell for the sake of advertising and both sexes are privy to the demoralization of genders.


[1] "Understanding the Gender Binary."www.genderbinary.wikidot.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 6 Feb 2012. <http://genderbinary.wikidot.com/gender-not-simple>.
[2] "How The Media Define Masculinity." www.media-awarness.ca. N.p., 2010. Web. 6 Feb. 2012.
[3] "50 Instances of Objectifying Men and Exploiting The Male Body." www.trendhunter.com. N.p., 08/02/2009. Web. 6 Feb 2012.

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Why Does Democracy Need Journalism and the First Amendment?


Why does a democracy need journalism and the First Amendment?

“Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost.”-Thomas Jefferson

Journalism can be defined by the act of informing and reporting information to the public. Freedom of press and speech is our First Amendment to the United States Constitution as Americans.  Democracy single-handedly plays a distinct role in journalism because it allows us to choose how we interpret information based on our own values and principles.
A democracy is “for the people, by the people” and journalism provides a means of hope by supplying unfettered communication through a wide range of facts and analysis to the people. The First Amendment entitles us to the freedom of speech that journalism demonstrates through various forms of mass media. Newspapers, internet, radio, and television express opinions and views of the world on a global scale. 
Free speech without a democracy could give power to the elite to change the laws and alter or forbid the right to speak freely without censorship. Our First Amendment protects the people’s voice; journalists in a free democracy are able to unveil the wrongs of a corrupt government whereas other political systems could silence reporters and eliminate their freedom of speech.
Journalism is a voice of information including hard facts, documented proof, awareness and sometimes even judgment. A free press and free expression are fundamental to the maintenance of liberty. To sustain a successful democracy, we need the open voice of journalism to speak to the people, about the people, for the people and to inform our community for the well-being of all.
Democracy needs journalism and the First Amendment because it directly correlates with communication, the right to speak freely without censorship and unveils and protects society from corruption. Freedom of speech allows individuals and groups to express differing views to be heard, even those that most Americans find horrendous, such as those opinions given by terrorists, racists and extremists.   As an American I will defend their right to speak freely but I will also reserve my right not to listen.

Q&A

On Journalism

1.      Now tell me again, what is your definition of journalism?
      Journalism is defined by the act of informing and reporting information to the public.

2.      How many different models of journalism exist today?  
      The four models of journalism today are traditional elite, advocacy, civil or public and web 2.0. These are established a variety of ways including, newspapers, radio, internet, magazines and television.

On Democracy

3.      What is your definition of democracy? 
      A democracy is “for the people, by the people” and a form of government that is exercised by the citizens to create, abolish or maintain public policy ruled by the majority.
4.      What is the difference between “election politics” and “public politics?" 
      Election politics refers to the campaign involved in creating recognition for a political official running for a position of power; and focuses on pandering issues to specific demographics to influence votes. Public politics is where the public expresses views and preference for changes in their community.

5.      What was the Lippmann v. Dewey debate?
      A debate that initiated in 1922 when Walter Lippman claimed that a journalists’ role was to inform the public as a intermediary to help them understand issues in politics that he considered to be too “complicated” for the public to interpret on their own. In contrast, John Dewey felt that the public was capable of interpreting such issues and strongly advocated that the public has a right to be informed without a middleman and public decisions should be made after debate and discussion.

On the First Amendment

6.      What does the First Amendment say exactly? 
      The First Amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
7.      Are any of those protections important in your life? All of these protections have a substantial role in my life. I consistently exercise my freedom of speech, and with a future career in journalism, these rights, and the rights of others, are especially relevant for me.

On Diversity

8.      Everybody keeps talking about diversity: Why is diversity in religion, speech, press, assembly and petition so important to a democracy? 
      Diversity is what makes our country the United States of America. It unites various cultures, demographics and religions so we can all come together and vote as a collective unit to form a government for all people. Democracy allows all Americans to have a voice to be heard and diversity only proves that it is not just a specific race, religion or gender—everyone has the equal right to support or defy any decisions they feel passionate about.  
9.      How do journalists and the First Amendment ensure that people hear diverse voices in the marketplace of ideas?
      It is a successful journalist’s job to report unbiased information to the public without catering to a particular idea or notion, so that diverse voices are heard in their reporting. A journalist should be certain to apply assorted perceptions and opinions of others (not themselves) in their report so diversity is acknowledged.

10.   Can you speak from personal experience about how diversity, protected by the First Amendment or championed by journalists, made a difference in your life?
      I have been fortunate to experience a fair amount of diversity; and I appreciate all journalists who are brave enough to report from a dangerous location in order to inform us all of what is happening in our community, nation and the world around us.

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Ovarian Cancer at Twenty-Three Years Old: From Hopeless to Helping



                      

Ovarian Cancer at Twenty-Three Years Old: From Hopeless to Helping

            I have chosen to discuss the personal and public issues of ovarian cancer after a close friend of mine, Diem Brown, discovered she had cancer at only twenty-three years old. After a successful remission, Diem vowed to help others who suffer through personal and medical hardships by creating the first and only Patient Gift Registry, www. Medgift.com. This unique online registry allows patients to have a medical registry-similar to that of a wedding, where instead of blenders and dishware, patients are able to create an online listing of various items they want or need that will assist with medical expenses. In this final essay, I will research the personal problems my friend, Diem experienced along with other stories I have discovered online through various chat rooms and the Cancer Survivors Network through the American Cancer Society.  This will include how cancer has affected Diem’s life, her cancer treatment and the medical care that was available to her and others. I will cover a real-life account of what cancer is like from the eyes of someone who lived through it, hid it from family and friends and managed to triumphantly defeat it.  I will then identify the public issues associated with ovarian cancer which include healthcare costs, treatment, and lack of insurance. I will discuss how possible public policies may contribute to many of the problems patients with ovarian cancer face on a consistent basis and suggestions to resolve it.
Diem Brown, a beautiful reporter living in Los Angeles, California had just been cast for a MTV reality show.  A few weeks before she was set to embark on this new opportunity, she received life altering news. Imagine being told you have Stage II Ovarian Cancer at the age of twenty-three! When I met Diem in 2005, unbeknownst to me, it was just a month since she had been given her diagnosis.  Today, I count her amongst my dearest friends. 
Before her diagnosis, Diem went to have a benign tumor removed from one of her ovaries. One year later, she then went to the doctor for her yearly check-up after noticing some abdominal swelling. It was that day, alone, she found out she had ovarian cancer. When she first heard the news, she told me she literally dropped to her knees and ran to her car. Shocked and in disbelief, she drove around for hours contemplating how this diagnosis was going to change her life, if not, end it.
Diem, by her own admission, has always been a healthy girl. She is vegetarian, active, does not smoke and rarely consumes alcohol. She was not familiar with cancer, let alone ovarian cancer. Her world was slowly crashing in around her when it was supposed to be a very exciting point in her life. She was afraid to tell her friends and family; her own mother recently passed away and she was terrified to see her father, a strong military man, have his heart broken all over again.
Her first instinct was to find information on ovarian cancer and the rate of survival. She spent countless hours on the internet and in chat rooms discussing her own situation with others experiencing the same. Initially however, she did not find this comforting because trying to understand other people who shared the same fears that she had only solidified and confirmed her thoughts. She went into a deep depression and refused to leave her apartment. Ovarian cancer begins in the ovaries and is the fifth most common cancer among women and more fatal than any other reproductive cancer. She was confused, part of her wanted to ignore it as if it was not really happening to her, another part of her thought she would soon see her mom again. After she overcame her initial shock, she thought this should be a battle she should fight alone. She did not want to worry her family or her friends, especially after the death of her mother. She also still wanted to compete on the MTV reality show and felt that if she had a limited time on this Earth, she was going to make the best of it. She did not want to feel hindered or incapacitated in any way despite the physical and emotional turmoil she was feeling inside.
She wanted to be brave and chose to go to her first doctor’s appointment alone. She walked in the office and after seeing other patients without hair and wearing oxygen masks, she nearly passed out. At that moment, she realized she could not do this alone and needed to tell her family.
"Hearing my Dad's voice crack as he made his best attempt to reassure me just broke my heart." Diem told me about the dreaded conversation with her family. "Of course they were supportive, and I did feel better after telling them. This is not something I--or anyone should have to go through alone." Feeling the support and unconditional love from her family, Diem decided to continue her research regarding ovarian cancer and treatments. She knew chemotherapy was vital to her survival and was terrified of losing her hair. "It is not about the vanity, of course a girl wants her hair, but I knew I could not hide from this "issue" if I saw illness in the mirror." said Diem. "I knew that not only would people closest to me know, but strangers on the street would be also aware that I was...different."
Diem received her doctor’s approval to compete on the MTV reality show, but went through two rounds of chemotherapy before leaving. “It was horrible, I won’t deny that, and it’s very long and uncomfortable…oh, how I hated the tingling. It is like a war zone with your body,” Diem described about her early experience. “I had to take several different medications for pain, fatigue and nausea during filming of the show.” She also explained she felt exhausted and slept a lot but was primarily concerned about injuries. “Your blood doesn’t clot well when you are on chemo and your immune system is weakened so those thoughts were consistently on my mind.” 
Diem bravely disclosed she had cancer to some of her cast mates. I was one of them. She didn't look sick and certainly didn't act as I would have suspected someone with "cancer" to behave. She was athletic, strong with long hair and loved to dance. She didn't want any of us to feel sorry for her and confidently told us she was going to beat it and she would be back for another season. I didn't doubt her.  However, her doctor did inform her that upon her arrival home, she could anticipate an immediate long and strenuous bout with chemotherapy.
After she returned home, she never went to a single doctor’s appointment alone, she followed every order her doctor suggested and after several painful months entered remission. She officially found out she was in remission on St. Patrick's Day in 2006, and was so elated she threw on a green wig to celebrate with her friends.  Diem was an instant "fan favorite" of the MTV program she been on, so she was offered another opportunity on the show. However, she was still in remission and didn't have any hair. Diem decided to go in spite of not having the long hair she had on her first season of the show. She was happy, hopeful and wanted to share there is a chance to beat cancer, and she was the living proof.
When Diem returned to the show, she wore a different wig every day, dependent on her mood. One day would wear a bright pink wig that was shoulder length and the next day, she would become a curly blonde. Other female cast members would wear one of her many wigs to show support. One particular afternoon during filming, the cast had to jump in a pool of water. Diem was hesitant; she had never been seen without her wig before; certainly not on national television! The camera slowly zoomed in on her as she pulled the wig off of her head. The cast stared at her wide-eyed and without missing a beat; Diem courageously jumped into the water and started the competition. People cried, and I still commend her for being so strong. It is hard enough to go through cancer, but to be seen in such a vulnerable state on national television is beyond inspiring.
Today, Diem is a healthy 28 year old woman, an entertainment reporter and founder of MedGift. The doctors removed one ovary and part of her fallopian tube. Diem isn't sure if she can have children one day or not but told me, "I can't live my life worrying about things I cannot control. I'm healthy and want people to know there is support out there despite feeling alone and scared."
I decided to look into some ovarian cancer chat rooms myself to see the type of support one can gain from fighting this cancer. Unfortunately, it was difficult to find a chat room with people in it! However, I did find some inspirational messages and support on various message boards and Facebook support groups. I learned that eating green vegetables rich in DMI can reduce the size of ovarian cancer tumors and World Cancer Day is February 4th. Some people shared fundraising efforts and provided links to their own or a loved one’s individual story. Other’s showed compassion, acceptance, and prayer. One woman, Darcy Rizzo, discussed symptoms while encouraging others to get blood work done. People explained different types of medication and I discovered that the oral tablet, Etoposide costs $2,000 dollars a month and Medicare will only pay 80%. Reading about this particular woman’s frustrations with medical expenses was disheartening.
While looking for political advocacies in ovarian cancer, I came across several issues that many women have to address despite their already terrifying diagnosis. Medication and treatment is costly and there are three main forms of treatment. The first form is removal of the cancer from the ovary, the second is chemotherapy which uses drugs to kill and eliminate the cancer cells and the third form is radiation treatment which is only used in particular cases. Radiation treatment uses very high energy X-rays to kill cancer cells. Treatment is based on each individual, dependent on their health, age, the severity or stage of cancer and the histologic cell type.
I joined the Cancer Survivors Network through the American Cancer Society so that I was able to communicate with cancer survivors for research. I was surprised at how emotional I felt from reading complete strangers circumstances. I noticed that once several patients were in remission, they were terrified of recurrence. One woman, only known on the message board as “Flame” was worried that she would have a recurrence and not see her children have their own babies. She remarked how the she read the survival rate to only be five years. Her plea for support from others was not only touching, but heartbreaking as well. To read other survivors tell her that she is an individual and to pay no mind to statistics was very inspirational. From fears of claustrophobia during PETscan (Positron Emission Tomography) to worrying about side effects of medication; this only proves that even after these women have successfully “beat” ovarian cancer, they will forever be emotionally scarred and perhaps secretly terrified that this cancer may one day resurface in their lives. I’ve discovered it is not only the patients themselves on these message boards, but husbands and children seeking answers or support for their families’ private pain.
To pay for the cost of medical expenses associated with ovarian cancer can be a heavy burden. Etoposide, an anti-cancer chemotherapy drug typically used in cancer of the lung or testicles can also be used to treat ovarian cancer. This drug can cost as much as $2,000 a month and Medicare will only pay 80% according to one woman who discussed her medication on an online message board. However, the unbelievable price of Doxil, which is used to treat ovarian cancer that is resistant to improvement or has even worsened, was billed to one woman’s private insurance company $30,800 for one single round! She went on to say that her insurance company paid more than $330,000 in one year for her cancer treatments—without any surgeries. Another expensive drug used to treat ovarian cancer is Topotecan. I found this cost comparison chart below to give an idea of the medical costs of Doxil vs. Topotecan is the United States. Conclusion: Doxil was actually found to have cost savings of $6,017/patient over Topotecan for relapsed ovarian cancer patients in the United States. [1] In researching to discover which drug would be more effective, it appears it depends on the individual patient. One woman claimed that Topotecan caused extreme fatigue and the schedule of treatment difficult to maintain. Another said it was a manageable chemo drug that caused no discomfort. Unfortunately, it seems each patient needs to discuss with their doctor their best option.           
Mean Cost ($ per Patient)

US Costs
Parameter
Doxil (n=118)
Topotecan (n=117)
All AEs
$985
$6,435
Selected AE costs*


Anemiaå
$26
$156
EPO
$151
$689
Neutropeniaå
$98
$2,184
G-/GM-CSF
$84
$2,323
PPE
$263
$1
Drug + Admin
$13,571
$14,138
TOTAL
$14,556
$20,573

Why do these drugs cost so much? Possibly because the drug companies primary incentive is to operate for profit. Another reason is for the cost of research and the economics involved with marketing and selling the drugs to sick patients.  “It takes about 7 to 10 years and an average cost of 500 million dollars to develop each new drug. This money is spent before the FDA approves the drug, and if the drug is not approved, the company loses the money. For instance, only one out of every ten thousand discovered compounds actually becomes an approved drug for sale. Much expense is incurred in the early phases of development of compounds that will not become approved drugs.  Prescription drug companies spend a lot of money on marketing due to competition and generic brands. Patients need to be sure to find a pharmacy that does participate with their insurance plan.
 It can be difficult for someone with ovarian cancer to manage their healthcare costs. First and foremost, the patient needs to be sure that doctors and hospitals she plans to use are in her healthcare network. Patients need to keep track of their insurance plans and their claims. To receive a second opinion, they need to be aware of the financial risks that may be included from their healthcare provider. Of course, if there is no insurance, the patient can check with the hospitals financial aid department to work out a payment arrangement. But the major issue is why they don’t have insurance.
            WHY DON’T THEY HAVE IT?? I joined the Cancer Survivors Network through the American Cancer Society so that I was able to communicate with cancer survivors for research. I was surprised at how emotional I felt from reading complete strangers circumstances. I noticed that once several patients were in remission, they were terrified of recurrence. One woman, only known on the message board as “Flame” was worried that she would have a recurrence and not see her children have their own babies. She remarked how the she read the survival rate to only be five years. Her plea for support from others was not only touching, but heartbreaking as well. To read other survivors tell her that she is an individual and to pay no mind to statistics was very inspirational. From fears of claustrophobia during PETscan (Positron Emission Tomography) to worrying about side effects of medication; this only proves that even after these women have successfully “beat” ovarian cancer, they will forever be emotionally scarred and perhaps secretly terrified that this cancer may one day resurface in their lives. I’ve discovered it is not only the patients themselves on these message boards, but husbands and children seeking answers or support for their families’ private pain.    
            In addition to the high cost of medication and treatment, the expenses in regards to the regular life patients are desperately trying to maintain, become nearly impossible to finance. For example, Diem Brown was just twenty-three years-old when she received her diagnosis and had beautiful, long blond hair.  During her treacherous bout with chemotherapy, she lost all of her hair. Her body was a war zone and she felt like she had her femininity “cut” out of her and the loss of her hair only amplified her emotions. She wanted a wig, but it was expensive. Her insurance was not going to pay for superficial items that do not have a medical purpose. Any money she did have went to pay bills as she was no longer able to work. Depressed and financially strapped, she came across a girlfriend’s wedding registry while at home one afternoon. As she looked through the list of monogrammed towels, blenders and silverware, it dawned on her that she wished she could create a registry for patients as opposed to brides.
MedGift, is the first and only patient registry which is similar to a bridal registry. This allows a patient to register for all things needed for treatment and/or recovery. "Everyone asks how they can help or what they can do," Diem said. "This gives the opportunity for people to help a patient with medical costs, wigs, wheelchairs and even groceries. Non-monetary items can be organized as well, such as babysitting and transportation." For the past six years, Diem has passionately dedicated herself to helping others suffering from cancer, a car accident or even a war veteran in need of treatment. “I’ve been through it and it’s hard, but you don’t have to be alone. People who love you do want to help, some just aren’t sure how. This gives them the opportunity to see how they can help, by looking up your registry. Instead of a wedding registry about joining two lives, this is about fighting for a life.”
This unique gift registry initially began with the desire for Diem to have a nice, realistic wig to make her feel pretty again, but has grown into nationwide medical social network to inspire and create hope in patients. MedGift is composed of three primary sections: needs, wants and wishes. The “needs” section is related to medical expenses with treatment and recovery. This will enable supporters to help provide financial assistance via the secured website directly to the patient who can choose and accept their offerings. The “wants” section is for help with wigs, meals, magazine subscriptions and other items that may not be deemed by society as actually being necessary. However, this still provides the patient with emotional and physical security while coping with treatment and recovery. Finally, there is the “wishes” section that assists the patient with childcare, transportation and even prayer. Each patient has their own profile page where they can update their loved ones on their health and daily successes.
The public medical policies and issues arising from high costs of healthcare and lack of medical insurance are what inspired Diem to initiate MedGift. This registry helps create a way for family, friends and even strangers to contribute their money, time and prayers in consideration of a patient.  Patients should also educate themselves on helpful patient advocacy groups such as The Patient Advocate Foundation, where they help with medical debt crisis and insurance issues. In addition to MedGift, knowing and understanding their insurance benefits and researching which hospitals are in their healthcare network; can help patients manage their expenses more easily and focus on what really matters: getting healthy again.


[1] . "American Society of Clinical Oncology: Cost-Identification of Doxil vs. Topotecan for Relapsed Ovarian Cancer in the United States." asco.org. Sanofi Aventis, 2012. Web. 15 Mar 2012. 

Hello All!

Hi guys, I had to create a blog for my Journalism class at the University of Kentucky, so here I will be posting my random thoughts.