Why does a democracy
need journalism and the First Amendment?
“Our liberty depends on the freedom
of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost.”-Thomas
Jefferson
Journalism
can be defined by the act of informing and reporting information to the public.
Freedom of press and speech is our First Amendment to the United States
Constitution as Americans. Democracy
single-handedly plays a distinct role in journalism because it allows us to
choose how we interpret information based on our own values and principles.
A
democracy is “for the people, by the people” and journalism provides a means of
hope by supplying unfettered communication through a wide range of facts and
analysis to the people. The First Amendment entitles us to the freedom of
speech that journalism demonstrates through various forms of mass media.
Newspapers, internet, radio, and television express opinions and views of the
world on a global scale.
Free
speech without a democracy could give power to the elite to change the laws and
alter or forbid the right to speak freely without censorship. Our First
Amendment protects the people’s voice; journalists in a free democracy are able
to unveil the wrongs of a corrupt government whereas other political systems
could silence reporters and eliminate their freedom of speech.
Journalism
is a voice of information including hard facts, documented proof, awareness and
sometimes even judgment. A free press and free expression are fundamental to
the maintenance of liberty. To sustain a successful democracy, we need the open
voice of journalism to speak to the people, about the people, for the people
and to inform our community for the well-being of all.
Democracy
needs journalism and the First Amendment because it directly correlates with
communication, the right to speak freely without censorship and unveils and
protects society from corruption. Freedom of
speech allows individuals and groups to express differing views to be heard,
even those that most Americans find horrendous, such as those opinions given by
terrorists, racists and extremists. As an American I will defend
their right to speak freely but I will also reserve my right not to listen.
Q&A
On Journalism
1.
Now tell me
again, what is your definition of journalism?
Journalism is defined by the
act of informing and reporting information to the public.
2.
How many
different models of journalism exist today?
The four models of journalism today are traditional elite, advocacy,
civil or public and web 2.0. These are established a variety of ways including,
newspapers, radio, internet, magazines and television.
On Democracy
3.
What is your
definition of democracy?
A democracy is “for the people, by the people” and a
form of government that is exercised by the citizens to create, abolish or
maintain public policy ruled by the majority.
4.
What is the
difference between “election politics” and “public politics?"
Election politics
refers to the campaign involved in creating recognition for a political
official running for a position of power; and focuses on pandering issues to
specific demographics to influence votes. Public politics is where the public
expresses views and preference for changes in their community.
5.
What was the
Lippmann v. Dewey debate?
A debate that initiated in 1922 when Walter Lippman
claimed that a journalists’ role was to inform the public as a intermediary to
help them understand issues in politics that he considered to be too
“complicated” for the public to interpret on their own. In contrast, John Dewey
felt that the public was capable of interpreting such issues and strongly
advocated that the public has a right to be informed without a middleman and
public decisions should be made after debate and discussion.
On the First Amendment
6.
What does the
First Amendment say exactly?
The First Amendment states, “Congress
shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free
exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the
right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a
redress of grievances.”
7.
Are any of those
protections important in your life? All of these protections have a substantial
role in my life. I consistently exercise my freedom of speech, and with a
future career in journalism, these rights, and the rights of others, are
especially relevant for me.
On Diversity
8.
Everybody keeps
talking about diversity: Why is diversity in religion, speech, press, assembly
and petition so important to a democracy?
Diversity is what makes our country the United States of America . It unites
various cultures, demographics and religions so we can all come together and
vote as a collective unit to form a government for all people. Democracy allows all Americans to have a voice to be
heard and diversity only proves that it is not just a specific race, religion or
gender—everyone has the equal right to support or defy any decisions they feel
passionate about.
9.
How do
journalists and the First Amendment ensure that people hear diverse voices in
the marketplace of ideas?
It is a successful journalist’s job to report
unbiased information to the public without catering to a particular idea or
notion, so that diverse voices are heard in their reporting. A journalist
should be certain to apply assorted perceptions and opinions of others (not
themselves) in their report so diversity is acknowledged.
10. Can you speak
from personal experience about how diversity, protected by the First Amendment
or championed by journalists, made a difference in your life?
I have been
fortunate to experience a fair amount of diversity; and I appreciate all
journalists who are brave enough to report from a dangerous location in order
to inform us all of what is happening in our community, nation and the world
around us.




Good Job Kate!!!!
ReplyDeleteAnother great post. I actually learnt a lot of new information. Well written and though provoking. Unfortunately I cannot debate with you, because I agree with everything you wrote.
ReplyDeleteThis blog is making me think and that is a good thing Katie
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comments guys!
DeleteGreat article Katie...I agree with you 100% amazng read !!!
ReplyDeleteGreat read Katie! Your an awesome writer and i look forward to reading more of your blogs in the future!
ReplyDeleteGreat blog, however I wish today's journalists were unbiased when it comes to reporting on politics. Journalists in most countries, will only report facts as far as politics are concerned , if they support them ideologically. This is where journalists have really failed society, and we are worse off for it!
ReplyDeleteGreat blog, I completely agree with you.
ReplyDeleteGood article Katie!
ReplyDeleteGood read and factual info.
ReplyDeleteVery well researched--and your article is written and posted to hold the reader's attention !!!
ReplyDeleteEnjoyed reading your blog. Well written and I think your ready to join the Journalism world.
ReplyDeleteAs Americans I feel we really take freedom of speech for granted. It's good to keep this topic up for discussion.
ReplyDeleteWell written, Katie. Keep up the good work. I look forward to reading your future posts!
ReplyDeletegreat post. freedom of speech is so important to democracy and i don't thin people realize that.
ReplyDeleteThis article was informative and very well written. You may have mentioned how the journalists political view can affect the way he writes his article. These views can cause the reader to be misinformed because the writer failed to include the facts because they felt that the truth clashed with their political view.
ReplyDeleteThank God for the 1st Amendment! Great article, Katie, it made me grateful that I am able to choose from the various methods of journalism what I choose to believe.
ReplyDeleteThe First Amendment sets the criteria for which we live, learn, and die. Unfortunately, I think that some journalist are biased,as are some TV news stations. CNN News is basically offering a democratic view of politics, whereas, Fox News is of a republican opinion. Because the stations have chosen to be one-sided, most American's choose one channel over the other depending on their own political views.
ReplyDeleteGreat job Kate.
ReplyDeleteI feel that most journalists are biased and report information based on sensationalism. They use shocking material to glamorize a media event. I have witnessed this first hand living thru the riots in 1968 and the "riot" following a rock concert in Grant Park in 1970. Most of the events were reported accurately - but usually a great deal was left out.
After watching the debates I feel a disconnect between politicians and the common American worker. I wish that issues pertaining to American workers would be addressed. ie: Gingrich's martial issues put on public display as the first question in a Presidental debate. Glamourization.
I have worked in the Chicago's South Loop area for 21 years and have read the misrepresentation of crimal assualts or the non reporting of crimal assualts because the victims were not news worthy or just not important enough. Not sensational enough.
I would not like to live in a democracy with out journalists. They are our watch dog over politicans. In Chicago they have been instrumental in helping prosecute politicans (Gov. Blago)and the Mafia (Family Secrets Trial). Without journalists criminals and politicians would run amuck.
Let's not get me started on the coverage of movie stars and not the loss of soldiers in Afganistan...
journalists helps to keep our minds open and if they were not free to share our views we aould all live in the box the government wants to put us in
ReplyDelete